It’s all so muddling. What are we to believe? Is that how it is supposed to be? Perhaps. Are we embroiled in times that dwarf the travails of past generations, or are we merely inundated with the imagery of those with competing agendas? 
Many wise men have stated some universal things that all boil down to one fact about which I think it is safe to say…’you can take to the bank’.
 In essence: It is the nature of leadership that, one; it attracts the type of personality that is fundamentally corrupt, and two; by the very nature of such a personality, these leaders(elected, appointed or ordained by some god or other) do not care about those that they lead. Why is this such a difficult concept for the common man to grasp? I dunno. It seems obvious to me. Maybe because, although I have met many ‘leaders’…in politics, industry, religion…I have yet to meet one that is chiefly concerned with those that he governs.
I will even count myself among them. I enjoyed management positions for many years, and I can tell you with no hesitation, that the welfare of those that I led, (beyond what such concern could do for me in the short term) was the last thing on my mind. That is the nature of leadership. To manage. To manipulate. To use. 
This is not a secret. This is in every management training course. Management is manipulation. To sign on with this program of manipulating people speaks to the integrity of those that lead. So why do we think that our ‘leaders’ will somehow turn over a new leaf and begin putting their own benefit on the back burner to concentrate on what their followers want? Why indeed.

And yet people continually petition their politicians for change that will benefit the masses. Until a person with power over others sees the ‘what’s in it for me’ first…such change will not happen. When a leader is begged to consider the true will of those that he leads, and it doesn’t coincide with what he wants or needs first, all that it accomplishes is to force the one in charge to lie. Lie about what he is doing in his office, and what he intends to do for his flock. The only ones to please with any ‘leader’s’ policy are the ones above them. Surely this is obvious. Everyone has a boss. Heaven knows that the first thing that struck me when ascending to management, was the amount of those to please above me had quadrupled. Where as a worker-bee, I had but one bosses’ ass to kiss, as a middle manager, I was on my knees constantly. Of course, however, in politics as in production management, the goal of an upward mobility is to pare down the number of derrieres presenting themselves to you for oral genuflection. Until you are the one seeking such worship from everyone below you, and you answer only to yourself. A consummation devoutly to be wished. But rarely attained.

When I had been in middle management for a few years and was completing the image of myself as a man-among-men. Seeing myself as more capable than my fellow bees, well it followed that I also saw a man in the mirror that was ‘better’ than those he led. A dangerous tendency lying in the hearts of the best of us, to be sure.
So I was promoted several times and then transferred to leadership of my own district. Among the immediate changes that such a move demanded was to head a weekly meeting of engineers from several companies that purchased our product. I was the man. I had to update, defend and answer questions about my company’s products on a weekly basis to an audience of men wearing suits that cost more than my car. Needless to say, I was tongue-tied at the first meeting. These seasoned professionals took pity on my having been thrust into an awesome responsibility at such a young age and with little to no speaking skills. I soon warmed to it however. It was my job and I did it to the best of my abilities…which were improving constantly. To the point at which, I looked forward to my time in the spotlight, and garnered respect for the wit and ease with which I discharged my meetings. No harm done. But was there?
I tell you this because I understand the mentality behind those hooked on power. Even the smallest amount. It is addictive. It is a glorious feeling to know that you are taken seriously…whether you should or shouldn’t be.
But that’s as may be. As a supervisor, I learned that people are merely tools to be used. Babysat for the most part. But using the manipulative tricks of rewarding profitable behaviour, to chiding the child in my workers over failure to complete a task that no one in their right mind would want to do, I understood the limits to the direction of leaders that the common man will brook. As a middle manager, I learned that the right low-level decisions could make or break me. As an executive manager, I learned to see people as not only tools but commodities. I learned to lie big. To shift blame. To cheat. To steal. All in the name of leadership. Machiavellian self-preserving hubris.
No…I didn’t find Jesus. My ego had grown to the point that at one juncture I fought with the CEO of my company over an issue about which he was wrong…and of course, I was right. His ‘leadership’ position trumped mine, and I resigned over it. Hallelujah. I quickly fell back to earth where I belong. But not without taking a few important lessons with me. About power. About leaders. And about the world in which we struggle under ‘leaders’.

So when I see ‘leaders’ in our struggle against what we see as the most potent international force of “the tribe”, stepping up to the leadership plate, I gotta pause. My contention is that we don’t need leadership in any way, shape or form. It is too lofty a position even for the most trustworthy among us. And I remember that along with such leadership positions comes a lot of vain preening and total disregard for anyone ‘below’ you.
Now, I don’t tell you all this as some sort of excuse for those that have gained power over you and have abused such artificial office.
But to counter the old saying that “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely”. As in my case, the first part of that maxim can be true. But generally speaking, for those that would corrupt a company, a nation…a world. The corruption was already there within these leaders. You simply give them the power to use it.


Care About The Bleeding Crowd

Often nowadays, I find myself looking at google analytics on my site traffic. That is to say that I am painfully aware of my traffic here. Who they are. When they come. What draws them. What doesn’t. What pushes them on down the road. And what they take with them from here when they do push on.
I’m not in love with what I see, more often than not. It has come to the point(or perhaps it was always thus), that unless I say the right things, the graph trips over itself and tumbles downward. I’m sure a few readers out there(you know who you are), don’t judge so capriciously, but generally speaking I find that I have entered a contest that I never intended to enter. And I’m more worried about the burning lungs in my chest than who just passed me. I never really got races. I never really understood competition in any form.
But hey, that may just be me.
However, back to saying the right thing. That is a tricky business. I

know what readers out here in the blogosphere want to read. I know they want me to point ad infinitum to this evil group or the other, and ‘tsk tsk’ them. I know that there is this camp and that one, that have their favorite demons. If I’m lucky I will hit on a few and the amen crowd will reward me with hits and…well, amens. They will hyperlink and electronically applaud for my hour or so work of putting one slanderous word after another, attaching a few images, choosing a pleasing color and selling a package of observation with my particular flavor. I’m kinda over it though. And apparently, I’m only holding my own within the trailing pack that is just rounding the 3ed turn anyway.

There seem to be various formulas for success out here where I have chosen to reside for a certain percentage of my precious time; for all time is precious. If success is one’s goal.
But of all the various postulates out here, they all seem to have one thing in common if they want to garner attention. And that is that somehow, the entire world’s population(except, of course, the author and readers of these successful endeavors) are being controlled. Controlled against their will and common sense if they would just wake up. See the devil for who he is and his master plan for world domination(which I would think these demons would already have if they already have so much control).

Well, I have chosen my enemy as per the unwritten rules out here. And the more I rail on and on about a ‘philosophy’ of a loosely-knit cult that call themselves ‘jews’, I am still seen as one that would demonize an entire group of humans. And if I stray from such cultural bigotry…again, my graph line starts heading south.

When I was forced, by various social means, to play(amerikan) football, I was preselected to be a lineman. I was big for my age and bulky. A threat. That’s the nature of that game I hated for years and still do. I can almost always tell the guys that didn’t play more than touch, or flag football in their youth. They make up most of the male football fans of today. It’s like driving a huge truck or Harley. Outward appearance of manliness that doesn’t reveal one’s lack thereof. But anyway, suffice to say, I hated it. Someone once said that it is the perfect amerikan game: Violence punctuated with committee meetings. I couldn’t agree more. But it was more than that to me. It foreshadowed all the jobs that I was to have later in life. Y’know…hierarchy. Bullies. Having to take shit from some ‘leader’ that didn’t know his ass from a hole in the ground. Suffering for their glory. Oh, well.
I remember a defining moment in my short-lived career out there on the line. After one of our brilliant QB’s play calls that failed, he of course blamed everyone on the line for his failure to lead us effectively a few more yards toward ‘his’ goal. And he focused his anger at me and my fellow left lineman. As we tripoded down onto the next scrimmage, we two merely glanced at each other and grinned through our facegaurds. At snap we both slid away from each other enough to open a hole that you could drive a steamroller through. Which was exactly what happened. The entire opposing team funneled through our gap, and that preening asswipe of a quarterback left the gridiron on a stretcher. 
I love watching bullies get their comeuppance. I like to be the cause of it when I can. We all do, I guess. Unless we are the bullies. But would we even know if we are? I could be seen as a spoiled imperialist-capitalist pig by probably 75% of the world. If you were to look at how I live. I have a roof over my head, a vehicle and some money saved. I eat regularly and have time to type this tripe often. I have won a race that I didn’t even consciously enter. And yet I have the unmitigated gall to preach that I have a social conscience. That I “…care about the bleeding crowd”, when generally speaking, I don’t. If I did, I would give away all that I could to those that are not so fortunate. And if I truly cared about my internet ranking, I would write exactly what millions of people want to read. That there is an evil-dooer group that are bent on the death of every other living creature in the world. That by my observant typing, I will champion your cause against ‘the man’, no matter who he is. I am aware and awake and I am going to lead you to such consciousness.

The only things I am genuinely aware of, are these: The world has ALWAYS been going to hell in a hand-basket. There has ALWAYS been war and slaughter and bigotry and blind hatred and devious leadership and greed at the top. And, more importantly, there ALWAYS will be these conditions. I’m sorry…that’s just the way it is. It is my considered opinion that if you don’t see this fact…well, you either haven’t lived long enough or you are mentally unfit. If you foresee a day in which we all live in harmony and justice, you should ask your doctor if commitment is right for you. Seriously.
This, of course doesn’t mean that we have to like these continuous  conditions of our species. Or participate in them. We should fight such influence everywhere it is apparent…as we ALWAYS have, with varying degrees of force and results. The more that the ‘mad scientist’ in our midst believes and tries to implement world domination, the more the common man will rebel. That is what we are seeing at this particular junction in our history.
I rail on about judaism here because they are the ones causing all the most recent shit. That is not to say that they have always been the ones.

So care about the bleeding crowd, as much as you feel comfortable with, but do not live under the delusion that this is the worst that it could possibly get. It has been much worse many times for many more. But it hasn’t been as ‘in your face’ as it was in our decadent past due to the lack of our now all-prevalent media. Who knows what would have happened if wikileaks was around to reveal Rothschild’s little buy-the-bank-of-England trick. What if social media was around to expose Spartan camps where preteen boys were kept for the warrior’s pleasure? What if a youtube video was made of Caligula’s court of orgies? Or a thousand other ‘new’ lows to which we have allowed ourselves to sink.

We are bullied by the technology that is now in the hands of the ruling judaic. Use that technology to temporarily defeat this latest effort, but don’t think it is the last battle. Don’t deceive yourself that your progeny will live in a world in which such battles are no longer necessary. Just make sure that the fruit of your loins is not part of the next group of deluded bullies that desire to lord over the next bleeding crowd.

The Liberation of the Death Camps

The Liberation of the Death Camps

Source: The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies, by Theodore J. O’Keefe
Presented with pictures, captions and extensive commentary by Lasha Darkmoon
Why is it illegal in 16 countries to doubt the gas chambers when not a single gas chamber has ever been found?

Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes that US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at the close of World War II.

At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention camps, horrified US infantrymen encountered heaps of dead and dying inmates, emaciated and diseased. Survivors told them hair-raising stories of torture and slaughter, and backed up their claims by showing the GIs crematory ovens, alleged execution gas chambers, supposed implements of torture, and even shrunken heads and lampshades, gloves, and handbags purportedly made from skin flayed from dead inmates.

US government authorities, mindful that many Americans who remembered the atrocity stories fed them during World War I still doubted the Allied propaganda directed against the Hitler regime, resolved to “document” what the GIs had found in the camps. Prominent newsmen and politicians were flown in to see the harrowing evidence, while the US Army Signal Corps filmed and photographed the scenes for posterity. Famous journalist Edward R. Murrow reported, in tones of horror, but no longer of disbelief, what he had been told and shown, and Dachau and Buchenwald were branded on the hearts and minds of the American populace as names of infamy unmatched in the sad and bloody history of this planet.

For Americans, what was “discovered” at the camps — the dead and the diseased, the terrible stories of the inmates, all the props of torture and terror — became the basis not simply of a transitory propaganda campaign but of the conviction that, yes, it was true: the Germans did exterminate six million Jews, most of them in lethal gas chambers.

What the GIs found was used, by way of films that were mandatory viewing for the vanquished populace of Germany, to “re-educate” the German people by destroying their national pride and their will to a united, independent national state, imposing in their place overwhelming feelings of collective guilt and political impotence. And when the testimony, and the verdict, of the Nuremberg Tribunal incorporated most, if not all, of the horror stories Americans were told about Dachau, Buchenwald, and other places captured by the US Army, the Holocaust could pass for one of the most documented, one of the most authenticated, one of the most proven historical episodes in the human record.

A Different Reality

LarsonBut it is known today that, very soon after the liberation of the camps, American authorities were aware that the real story of the camps was quite different from the one in which they were coaching military public information officers, government spokesmen, politicians, journalists, and other mouthpieces.

When American and British forces overran western and central Germany in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.

Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America’s leading forensic pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team, Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim work at Dachau, he was questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors. [1]

Dr. Larson’s findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: “What we’ve heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that is a hoax.” [2] And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his biographer that to his knowledge he “was the only forensic pathologist on duty in the entire European Theater” of Allied military operations, [3] confirmed that “never was a case of poison gas uncovered.” [4]

Typhus, Not Poison Gas

If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate victims at Dachau, Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they tortured to death or deliberately starved? The answers to these questions are known as well.

As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men discovered, the chief cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other camps was disease, above all typhus, an old and terrible scourge of mankind that until recently flourished in places where populations were crowded together in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in Germany at war’s end, where, despite such measures as systematic delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the dead, the virtual collapse of Germany’s food, transport, and public health systems led to catastrophe.

Perhaps the most authoritative statement of the facts as to typhus and mortality in the camps has been made by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D., Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that “The outbreaks in concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus infection encountered in Germany.” Dr. Gordon summarized the causes for the outbreaks as follows: [5]

Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an astounding sight, a mixture of humanity traveling this way and that, homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them …

Germany was in chaos. The destruction of whole cities and the path left by advancing armies produced a disruption of living conditions contributing to the spread of the disease. Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were seriously disrupted, food supply and food distribution was poor, housing was inadequate and order and discipline were everywhere lacking. Still more important, a shifting of populations was occurring such as few countries and few times have experienced.

Dr. Gordon’s findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that “Thousands of prisoners who died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II weren’t deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of diseases.” [6]

a1006Dr. Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed each day.

Despite noisily publicized claims and widespread popular notions to the contrary, no researcher has been able to document a German policy of extermination through starvation in the German camps.

No ‘Human Skin’ Lampshades

What of the ghoulish stories of concentration camp inmates skinned for their tattoos, flayed to make lampshades and handbags, or other artifacts? What of the innumerable “torture racks,” “meathooks,” whipping posts, gallows, and other tools of torment and death that are reported to have abounded at every German camp? These allegations, and even more grotesque ones proffered by Soviet prosecutors, found their way into the record at Nuremberg.

Ilse Koch, known as “Buchenwälder Schlampe” or the Bitch of Buchenwald. We are told that “she reveled in torture and obscenity”, making lampshades out of human skin showing the tattoos of Jewish camp inmates. The alleged human skin, upon forensic analysis after WW2, turned out to be goat skin. Ilse Koch hanged herself in despair  at Aichach women’s prison on September 1, 1967 — yet another innocent victim of Jewish lies still which are still being perpetrated to this day. Here she is listed as one of the “10 Most Evil Women in History”,  along with Countess Elizabetrh Bathory of Hungary and childkiller Myra Hindley.  The lampshade and tattooed-skin charges were made against Ilse Koch, dubbed by journalists the “Bitch of Buchenwald,” who was reported to have furnished her house with objects manufactured from the tanned hides of luckless inmates.

Ilse Koch, known as “Buchenwälder Schlampe” or the Bitch of Buchenwald. We are told that “she reveled in torture and obscenity”, making lamp shades out of human skin showing the tattoos of Jewish camp inmates. The alleged human skin, upon forensic analysis after WW2, turned out to be goat skin. Ilse Koch hanged herself in despair at Aichach women’s prison on September 1, 1967 — yet another innocent victim of Jewish lies which are still being perpetrated to this day. Here she is listed as one of the “10 Most Evil Women in History”, along with Countess Elizabeth Bathory of Hungary and child-killer Myra Hindley.

But General Lucius Clay, military governor of the US zone of occupied Germany, who reviewed her case in 1948, told his superiors in Washington: “There is no convincing evidence that she [Ilse Koch] selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins or that she possessed any articles made of human skin.” [7] In an interview General Clay gave years later, he stated about the material for the infamous lampshades: “Well, it turned out actually that it was goat flesh. But at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for her to have gotten a fair trial.” [8]

Ilse Koch hanged herself in a German jail in 1967.


†   Lasha Darkmoon comments: It is now common knowledge that all the tall stories relating to Jewish skin being turned into lamp shades are grotesque fabrications. There is not a single Holocaust scholar in the world today who believes these fairy tales any longer. Even Jewish Wikipedia asks the question, “Did the Germans make lamp shades from prisoners’ skin?” and gives the answer: “No, they didn’t…it seems to be a popular urban legend.”

In spite of this, “Holocaust survivors” still continue to spread these false stories in schools across the country, perverting the minds of children with their vicious lies. One such is Czechoslovakian Jewess Frida Herskovits who told schoolchildren quite recently that she had learned of Nazi surgeries in which Jewish “organs were removed and human skin was used to make lamp shades and picture frames.”

Frida had not only seen Nazi guards throw sick Jews into a ditch and burn them alive after dousing them with kerosene—“The screams were unbelievable!”—she had also witnessed with her own eyes a pregnant mother have her baby ripped out of her womb by German Shepherd dogs!

If you want to see a photo of Frida, looking unusually jolly for a woman so traumatized, click here.


It would be tedious to itemize and refute the thousands of bizarre claims as to Nazi atrocities. That there were instances of German cruelty, however, is clear from the testimony of Dr. Konrad Morgen, a legal investigator attached to the Reich Criminal Police, whose statements on the witness stand at Nuremberg have never been challenged by proponents of the Jewish Holocaust story. Dr. Morgen informed the court that he had been given full authority by Heinrich Himmler, commander of Hitler’s SS and the dread Gestapo, to enter any German concentration camp and investigate instances of cruelty and corruption on the part of camp personnel.

As he explained in sworn testimony at Nuremberg, Dr. Morgen investigated 800 such cases, resulting in more than 200 convictions. [9] Punishments included the death penalty for the worst offenders, including Hermann Florstedt, commandant of Lublin (Majdanek), and Karl Koch (Ilse’s husband), commandant of Buchenwald.

While German camp commandants in certain cases did inflict physical punishment, such acts had to be approved by authorities in Berlin, and it was required that a camp physician first certify the good health of the prisoner to be disciplined, and then be on hand at the actual beating. [10] After all, throughout most of the war the camps were important centers of industrial activity. The good health and morale of the prisoners was critical to the German war effort, as is evidenced in a January 1943 order issued by SS General Richard Glücks, chief of the office that supervised the concentration camps. It held the camp commanders “personally responsible for exhausting every possibility to preserve the physical strength of the detainees.” [11]

Camp Survivors: Merely Victims?

US Army investigators, working at Buchenwald and other camps, quickly ascertained what was common knowledge among veteran inmates: that the worst offenders, the cruelest denizens of the camps, were not the guards but the prisoners themselves. Common criminals of the same stripe as those who populate US prisons today committed many villainies, particularly when they held positions of authority, and fanatical Communists, highly organized to combat their many political enemies among the inmates, eliminated their foes with Stalinist ruthlessness.

Two US Army investigators at Buchenwald, Egon W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, carefully investigated circumstances in the camp before its liberation. In a detailed report submitted to their superiors, they revealed, in the words of Alfred Toombs, their commander, who wrote a preface to the report, “how the prisoners themselves organized a deadly terror within the Nazi terror.” [12]

Fleck and Tenenbaum described the power exercised by criminals and Communists as follows:

The [Jewish] trusties, who in time became almost exclusively Communist Germans, had the power of life and death over all other inmates. They could sentence a man or a group to almost certain death … The Communist trusties were directly responsible for a large part of the brutalities at Buchenwald.

Colonel Donald B. Robinson, chief historian of the American military government in Germany, summarized the Fleck-Tenenbaum report in an article published in an American magazine shortly after the war. Colonel Robinson wrote succinctly of the American investigators’ findings:

“It appeared that the prisoners who agreed with the Communists ate; those who didn’t starved to death.” [13]

Additional corroboration of inmate brutality has been provided by Ellis E. Spackman, who, as Chief of Counter-Intelligence Arrests and Detentions for the US Seventh Army, was involved in the liberation of Dachau. Spackman, later a professor of history at San Bernardino Valley College in California, wrote in 1966 that at Dachau “the prisoners were the actual instruments that inflicted the barbarities on their fellow prisoners.” [14]


†   Lasha Darkmoon comments:  Another Jewish Holocaust survivor, Yanina Cywinska, tells us she had witnessed evil Nazis “parade around briefcases and lamps made of human skin while washing their bodies with soap composed of Jewish bones.” She is obviously unaware that the human soap story has been proved every bit as false as the human lamp shade story.

In 1981, professor of Modern Jewish History and Holocaust expert Deborah Lipstadt wrote in a letter to the Los Angeles Times that “the fact is, the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that matter, anyone else, for the production of soap. The soap rumor was thoroughly investigated after the war and proved to be untrue.”

Shmuel Krakowski, Director of Archives of Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust Center, confirmed in a Chicago Tribune article titled, “A Holocaust Belief Cleared Up” that: “historians have concluded that soap was not made from human fat.”

This doesn’t stop Yanina Cywinska and other “Holocaust Survivors” like her from manufacturing human soap and lampshade stories ad infinitum.

Yanina had seen some horrible things happen in the concentration camps, including “nails and eyes pulled out of Jewish people.” This would probably account for her pessimism and negative attitude toward Yaveh. “If God is so almighty power,” she asks grimly, “why didn’t he stop the atrocities?” Good question. We’ll leave that to God.

If you want to see a photo of Yanina, looking particularly jolly for a woman so traumatized, click here.


‘Gas Chambers’

In December 1944 US Army officers Colonel Paul Kirk and Lt. Colonel Edward J. Gully inspected the German concentration camp at Struthof-Natzweiler in Alsace. They submitted their findings to their superiors, who subsequently forwarded their report to the US War Crimes Division. While, significantly, the full text of their report has never been published, it has been revealed, by a historian supportive of Holocaust claims, that the two investigators were careful to characterize equipment exhibited to them by French informants as a “so-called lethal gas chamber,” and to claim it was “allegedly used as a lethal gas chamber.” [15] (Emphasis added)

Both the careful phraseology of the Natzweiler report, and its effective suppression, stand in stark contrast to the credulity, the confusion, and the blaring publicity that accompanied official reports of alleged gas chambers at Dachau. At first, a US Army photo depicting a GI gazing at a steel door marked with a skull and crossbones and the German words for: “Caution! Gas! Mortal danger! Don’t open!,” was identified as showing the murder weapon. [16]

Revisionist scholar Robert Faurisson: "Show me a gas chamber!"Later, however, it was evidently decided that the apparatus in question was merely a standard delousing chamber for clothing, and another alleged gas chamber, this one cunningly disguised as a shower room, was exhibited to American congressmen and journalists as the site where thousands breathed their last. While there exist numerous reports in the press as to the operation of this second “gas chamber,” no official report by trained Army investigators has yet surfaced to reconcile such problems as the function of the shower heads: Were they “dummies,” or did lethal cyanide gas stream through them? (Each theory has appreciable support in journalistic and historiographical literature.)

Revisionist scholar Robert Faurisson: “Show me a single gas chamber!”

As with Dachau, so with Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, and the other camps liberated by the Allies in western Germany. There was no end of propaganda about “gas chambers,” “gas ovens,” and the like, but so far not a single detailed description of the murder weapon and its function, not a single report of the kind that is mandatory for the successful prosecution of any assault or murder case in America at that time and today, has come to light.

Furthermore, a number of Holocaust authorities have now publicly decreed that there were no gassings, no extermination camps in Germany after all. (We are now told that “gassing” and “extermination” camps were located exclusively in what is now Poland, in areas captured by the Soviet Red Army and made off-limits to western investigators.)

Dr. Martin Broszat of the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary History, which is funded by the German government, stated categorically in a 1960 letter to the German weekly Die Zeit: “Neither in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other prisoners gassed.” [17] Professional “Nazi hunter” Simon Wiesenthal stated in 1975 and again in 1993 that “there were no extermination camps on German soil.” [18]

Dachau “gas chamber” No. 2, which was once presented to a stunned and grieving world as a weapon that claimed hundreds of thousands of lives, is now described in the brochure issued to tourists at the modern Dachau “memorial site” in these words: “This gas chamber, camouflaged as a shower room, was not used.” [19]

The Propaganda Intensifies

More than 50 years after American troops entered Dachau, Buchenwald and other German camps, and trained American investigators established the facts as to what had gone on in them, the government in Washington, the entertainment media in Hollywood, and the print media in New York continue to churn out millions of words and images annually on the horrors of the camps and the infamy of the Holocaust. Despite the fact that, with the exception of the defeated Confederacy, no enemy of America has ever so suffered so complete and devastating defeat as did Germany in 1945, the mass media and the politicians and bureaucrats behave as if Hitler, his troops, and his concentration camps continue to exist in an eternal present, and our opinion makers continue to distort, through ignorance or malice, the facts about the camps.


†   Lasha Darkmoon comments:  The story of Holocaust survivor Rivska Yosselevska is even more horrific and bizarre than those of Frida Herskovits and Yanina Cywinska related above. Despite being shot in the head and thrown into a pit with a mass of Jewish corpses piled on top of her, Rivska managed to claw her way to the top of the seething heap of limbs and somehow make her escape under the vigilant eyes of the Nazi guards. It wasn’t an easy job, given that the “dying victims” in the pit were “biting my legs, pulling me down.”

Other Jews also managed to crawl out of the pit and do a bunk for it, but the Nazis tracked them down and killed them all. Only Rivska survived to tell the tale. She lay three days by the side of the pit, utterly traumatized, “and saw blood spurting out of the ground.”

If you want to see a photo of Rivska, looking suitably traumatized, click here.


Time for the Truth

It is time that the government and the professional historians reveal the facts about Dachau, Buchenwald and the other camps. It is time they let the American public know how the inmates died, and how they didn’t die. It is time that the claims of mass murder by gassing are clarified and investigated in the same manner as any other claims of murder. It is time that the free ride certain groups have enjoyed as the result of unchallenged Holocaust claims be terminated, just as it is time to end the scapegoating of other groups, including Germans, eastern Europeans, the Roman Catholic hierarchy, and the wartime leadership of America and Britain, either for their alleged role in the Holocaust or their supposed failure to stop it.

Above all, it is time that the citizens of this great Republic have the facts about the camps, facts they have a right to know, a right that is fundamental to the exercise of their authority and their will in the governance of their country. As citizens and as taxpayers, Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, of all faiths, have a basic right and an overriding interest in determining the facts of incidents that are deemed by those in positions of power to be significant in determining America’s foreign and educational policy, as well as its selection of past events to be memorialized in our civic life.

Today the alleged facts of the Holocaust are at issue all over the civilized world. The truth will be decided only by recourse to the facts, in the public forum: not by concealing the facts, denying the truth, stonewalling reality. The truth will out, and it is time the government of this country, and governments and international bodies throughout the world, make public the evidence of what actually transpired in the German concentration camps in the years 1933-1945, so that we may put paid to the lies, without fear or favor, and carry out the work of reconciliation and renewal that is and must be the granite foundation of mutual tolerance between peoples and of a peace based on justice.


The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth about the wartime German concentration camps have since been corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:

The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result of a German policy of “extermination,” but rather the result of epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the effects of Allied aerial attacks.

Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp commanders and guards.

On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German policy and German orders.

The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional “Nazi-hunters” have quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and the other camps captured by the Soviets.


“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews constitute one and the same historical lie, which made possible a gigantic financial-political fraud, the principal beneficiaries of which are the State of Israel and international Zionism, and whose principal victims are the German people -- but not their leaders -- and the entire Palestinian people.” Robert Faurisson, the famous "60 words sentence", formulated in 1980. †   Lasha Darkmoon comments:  Did you know that that there is a Holocaust memorial center in Cuba where bars of soap allegedly made from Jewish fat are buried and held in high honor by endless streams of gullible tourists? The plaque reads: “Honoring their memory. In this place are buried pieces of soap made from Jewish human fat, part of 6 million victims of Nazi barbarism of the 2oth century. Peace to their remains.”

To read the plaque in Spanish, click here.

It’s the same old story in superstitious Rumania. In the town of Targu Mures, pilgrims pray over bars of soap allegedly made of “pure Jewish fat.” Quite a brisk trade is apparently done in these soap bars, each inscribed with the initials ‘RJF’—Reine Jüdisch Fett (pure Jewish fat). Needless to say, the soap is not meant to be used but to be buried in the cemetery at Targu Mures where people come to pray over the holy soap. Forensic analysis of the soap is not permitted; it is too sacred. (See here)


Robert Faurisson formulated this famous “60-word sentence” in 1980. It constitutes the position of most Holocaust Revisionist scholars today, in open defiance of the mainstream narrative:  “The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews constitute one and the same historical lie, which made possible a gigantic financial-political fraud, the principal beneficiaries of which are the State of Israel and international Zionism, and whose principal victims are the German people—but not their leaders—and the entire Palestinian people.”

It Ain’t Rocket Surgery…

As I mentioned in my last post, I have taken to watching Abby Martin occasionally. There are those that see her as a gatekeeper, comparing her to the likes of Rachel Maddow. And there are those that see her as a hopeful glimmer of journalism returning to its definitive roots. That the fourth estate will once again, with the advent of the competitive nature of net-based citizen journalism, recall those days before it became a mouthpiece for government propaganda(although I would be hard-pressed to provide such a time). Either way, her web-based program is a catalyst for controversy. And she is sexier than Noam Chomp-sky. 
That being said, this latest installment of “Breaking the Set” featured an interview with Miko Peled. He is gaining infamy for calling the bluff of the ‘jewish state’. And being the grandson of one of the founding fathers of israhell, and the son of an israhelli general, his perspective is fresh, personal and dangerous to the tribal zionista.

All well and good. I applaud him. I have read his book and I would rank it up there with “The Wandering Who” by Gilad Atzmon, “The Thirteenth Tribe” by Arthur Koestler, or “The Invention of the jewish People” by Shlomo Sand. All revealing works by jews themselves, rejecting what Atzmon calls “jewish identity politics”.
Again…all well and good. To a point. But I will try for the umpteenth time to delineate exactly why these combined literary efforts fall short of the truth as I see it. It isn’t brain science to me. But it seems to be to Abby; and seemingly anyone who investigates the jewish-zionist agenda objectively.
In her interview, if you haven’t yet seen it, she prefaces her critical remarks about israhelli policy toward Palestinians with the caveat: “…unfortunately, on the flipside(of accusations of antisemitism to those critical of ‘zionism’) there IS a lot of antisemitism online in writing and youtube…and unfortunately it has effected a lot of legitimate questioning of the israeli government and I don’t know why that’s so prevelant…”. 

She says this rather under her breath, as if saying “now, here’s a word from our sponsors”…which in essence is exactly what she is saying.
It is my opinion, having been raised around the jewish, having seen what that religion can and does produce in our modern world and what it has done in the past couple thousand years, that no one should be surprised. One should not try to separate ‘zionism’ from judaism. It is the logical political outcome of it. As was communism and is democracy. It is a bit more extreme…or kosher…but other than that, it is judaism in your face.
Gosh. I know. It’s tough to admit that your recent ancestors are murderers. Were savage assholes. It is even tougher to realize and bring to the front of your brain that the REASON they were ethnic cleansing filth, is that culture in which you yourself were raised. Catholics don’t consistently remind themselves how many people were slaughtered in the name of the holy Roman Church. I think the reason for this particular example is that they can assure themselves that causing such human suffering was not in the basic tenets of their religion. And that it is a faith of forgiveness, in theory anyway.
But jews have it really tough. There is no such humane edicts in their ‘religion’. No matter how you look at it…grandpa was a child-molesting, bloodthirsty animal or an unscrupulous usurer…BECAUSE of your familial religion. Those in your culture that haven’t committed such atrocities simply haven’t been pushed to the limits their epistemology.
This seems rather simple to me. Now.
Of course, I have come to this conclusion after doing a complete 180 degree trek. I have, as I am sure you have, muddled through the sludge of revised history and political correctness to arrive at these transparent facts. But maybe I’m not seeing something here. I welcome correction, but in my chuckle-headed view, if you teach your children that they are hated just for being who they are, and they always will be; that they are better human beings because they are so hated; and that they should essentially disregard the basic humanity of anyone outside their culture…well, you have the above mentioned results. Politically speaking: zionism, communism and democracy. Socially speaking, you have generations of people acting on this jewish disregard for the non-jewish, and this manifesting itself in the most disgusting nation-wrecking that this old world has yet to see.

So to answer Abby’s question as to “…why that’s so prevalent” in reference to TRUE anti-jewish behaviour(which I’m sure is what she meant)…well, duh.
People are not as stupid or ‘inferior’ as the talmud would have its followers believe. Firstly, I think they understand, or should, that jews are not a race. They are not even a nationality, even if it is the attempt of zionism to prove that they are. They are followers in a cult BASED on the very type of racism that they preach against. This is CLEAR. Why is it so easy to allow this to be obfuscated by the jew-biased media? As I am famous for saying here: I dunno. But to me, it ain’t rocket surgery. And it is as simple as it sounds. I have yet to read or hear anything to convince me otherwise. Not from half-measure jewish whistle-blowers, and definitely not from Abby Martin. No matter how S/M she looks.