Between Fear And Material Ecstasy

As anyone that frequents my site here knows, I do a LOT of jew-baiting. Most of it is dead-serious…some of it is tongue-in-cheek.

However, it must be tough to be a jew nowadays. I mean that sincerely.

On one hand a jew today has been handed the key to unlock most any door he sees fit to open, and on the other hand, the fact that he possesses that key by birthright only must be a constant source of guilt and fear. Do I pity them this? In a way, if and until they reject their culture entirely, yes.

If you are regular follower of my meanderings here you will know that I am a firm believer in the fact that jews are merely people…people duped by their religion as much, if not more than the followers of any mumbo-jumbo faith. The real difference, and the reasons for my blatant hatred of this particular theology, is their candid worship of wealth, and the means by which to attain it.
All other religions reject, in principle, the lure of wealth and all of it’s material trappings, whereas the jew is taught that there is no other spiritual aspiration equal to it.
This of course is due to the teachings of the Talmud(yes, I once sat down and actually read that filthy tome…in it’s entirety…know your enemy) and the fact that the jew holds dear to his heart…money buys power. Two things, until the emergence of the Rothschild family, the common ghetto-dwelling hebrew did not know in this world. Now they possess both. In spades.

So is it any wonder that so much of the jew’s time is spent in treatment of fear and guilt. Or that he even has appointed factions of his culture to deal with these emotions(ADL, psychiatry)? I think not. Or is it a puzzlement that the hebrew clings to his mythical or exaggerated tales of persecution? Of course not. It is an attempt to alleviate his guilt for the deeds with which he acquires his wealth…a self-feeding fantasy that falls short of any real motives.

When I gamble…which I do too much of…and I win any more than just enough to keep me going…when the bells and whistles go off on a slot telling me that I have won a hundred or so dollars(never anything huge…sigh), the first emotion that courses through my being is one of guilt. It is normally just a flash of a feeling. The paths that the synapses in our brains trace concerning wealth to which we owe no labor, is one that leads directly to the learned behaviour destination: “if you didn’t come by it honestly, you don’t deserve it”. That is very human, I think. Something that to a serious gambler must be learned to be repressed or eventually overridden entirely(if the gambler wins frequently). Maybe that is how the common jew today processes this basic guilt reflex. I don’t know. I am not a jew. But I have lived long enough as a human to know that not only is it natural to feel this guilt, it is also within the human sphere to then feel fear after such good luck. Fear that we will be found to be undeserving of such fortune, and fear that it will be taken away from us and we will be punished for possessing it. This I’m sure hearkens back to cave-man DNA about hoarding the kill.

Wherever this thought process comes from, it’s a good one. It is a morality in and of itself. It protects the interests of the group as a whole to assure that no individual hoards the wealth of the many. All of that has changed however since our stone-knife existence.

I lay blame for this at the door of the temple. The jewish are taught from the cradle that anything you can lay yours hands to, is yours. No matter how you get it…if you can get by with it, the fruits of the Gentile’s labour are yours for the stealing. This is a precept however that attempts to override these basic human instructions, and requires force to instill in the young. But it can be and is done on a daily basis in most jewish homes.

What a load to dump on a kid. Because of this “religion”, Gentile children are born into debt slavery and the jew’s own progeny are born into guilt and fear…what a great culture. As if the very nature of such goings-on of the historic jew isn’t enough to deal with, they lay this guilt and fear trip on their young as instruction for their futures. One hell of an “ethic” against which a child must rebel. I wonder if I could do it? Many jews have. From Freedman to Kapner the list is long and refreshing to behold. These are the ones that have rejected such rape-and-pillage teachings of their forefathers and have allowed us all to peek backstage at the trickery by which they have gained such riches. And I have no doubt in my mind that both fear and guilt drove them to reveal the methods of this dark cult. I applaud them. Before the eventual downfall of the tribe, there will be many, many more.

And their downfall is imminent. It comes with the territory. Guilt and fear are two of the most compelling human emotions out there. They will out. Repress them as they may try, they will consume them. They will at some point reflect on this “material ecstasy” which they have purchased with their ill-gotten gains and find it horribly lacking and shallow at best. Or they will go completely insane, which we are witnessing now with zionism. They will at some point feel the need to enjoy the more basic and guilt/fear-free pleasures of the world, as do most of us Gentiles, or self-destruct entirely. Either way, the human race will be shed of this pariah of the jew.


From Dr. Lasha Darkmoon: On Buddhism and the Jews

In response to the recent article by Dr. Lasha Darkmoon “Sex and the Jews”, a reader posed an intriguing question concerning Buddhism and it’s relationship to jews. To wit the following:


Lasha Darkmoon

Timster, Thank you for sending me your correspondent’s comment on Buddhism and its popularity as a religion among Jews. Your correspondent asks what the relation is between Jews and Buddhism. A fascinating question.

Point number one is this: there is no intrinsic relationship between Buddhism and Judaism as such. They are poles apart in every way.

Judaism is a legalistic religion with elaborate prescriptions, commandments, and prohibitions for every possible occasion. For example, the Talmud lays down the law about the precise number of days a man may not have sex with his wife before and after her period. Even if you look at someone, you have to be careful how you do it; there are a whole bunch of rules about correct looking procedures.

Judaism, moreover, is a monotheistic religion in which the existence of a personal God called Yahweh or (Jehovah) is assumed: not only a vengeful God, but a God who favors his own people, the Jews, and considers them the “Chosen”.

In contrast, Buddhism is a religion of universal appeal that assumes nothing — not even the existence of God. It is therefore an ideal religion for skeptics and indeed for atheists. It is for people who reject faith and blind belief, who refuse to kowtow to orthodox opinions imposed on them by other people who presume to know better. You could say that Buddhism is the ideal religion for deracinated intellectuals searching for a meaning in life and floundering about in a morass of doubts and confusions — a description that would apply to most Jews.

“It is better to travel than arrive,” says the Buddha.

The teaching of Buddha is basically this: life is permeated with suffering. This is caused by desire or craving (tanya). Suffering can only be ended by extinguishing desire and achieving a state of sublime detachment.

It was the Buddha who said, “He who loves fifty people has fifty sorrows; he who loves no one has no sorrows.”

I guess that’s “detachment” for you.
Enlightenment finally comes through right conduct and meditation. This releases one from all the suffering that is inherent in life and which is the result of being born: in being born not only once, but repeatedly, over and over again in an endless cycle of suffering known as the “Wheel of Rebirth.”

There was a time when I was myself a Buddhist. It is a noble religion. I was at my lowest ebb, at the point of suicide, when I opened a little white book in a bookstore and read these electrifying words that sent me into an instantaneous trance:

“All that we are is the result of what we have thought. It is founded on our thoughts, it is based on our thoughts. If a man speaks or acts with an evil thought, pain always follows him. If a man speaks or acts with a pure thought, happiness follows him like his shadow that never leaves him.”
That book is called the Dhammapada. It is a book of precious wisdom. The mind is indeed everything: what you think, that you become.

The point is this: most Jews are intelligent, and, like everyone else, they seek for a meaning in life. Though atheism comes naturally to them, they are not happy with it. Nor are most people, as this cartoon will demonstrate:

Many Jews find fulfillment in Buddhism because Buddhism makes no unreasonable demands on them. It is a religion you can embrace if you happen to be an atheist. It also holds out the comforts of reincarnation and continuity, though this is a point of some controversy and is not accepted by all Buddhists.

Nirvana, or “extinguishedness”, is the final aim for the Buddhist aspirant. Though what Nirvana actually is remains a mysterious paradox. Let’s just call it “the bliss of Non-Being.” If you can get your mind behind that concept, then you know far more about this complex subject than I do.

Point two is this: all religions and indeed all cults are fostered in America by organized Jewry except one religion. This religion is held in total detestation. Not a day goes by when attempts are not made, either on television or in the printed media, to vilify this religion and insult it in every way. This religion is Christianity.

You will appreciate the significance of all this when I tell you — I think I read this in one of Israel Shamir’s books — that when a Jew in Israel is converted to Buddhism or any of the Oriental religions, he still remains a Jew. No one turns a hair. He remains a respected member of the community. If he converts to Christianity, however, he CEASES TO BE A JEW AT ONCE. He is ostracized. And regarded as a traitor and renegade. The lowest of the low.

So now you know why Buddhism, Oriental religions, and various New Age cults are all looked upon by organized Jewry with favour: it is because they are NOT Christianity — because they offer people an alternative to the hated religion.

Christians are not only being persecuted in America right now, but all over the world.

The Vatican itself is under siege.

I once asked a Catholic priest, my personal friend, why the Church had turned its back on two thousand years of Catholic tradition and decided to make itself a branch of the synagogue.

Why had they capitulated to the state of Israel and cravenly recognized its legitimacy, given that it had been built on stolen land?

He looked stricken.

“We had no choice,” he sighed. “If we hadn’t agreed to do what they say, they would have started burning down our churches and raping our nuns.”

(A copy of the Turin Shroud, thought by many to be a miraculous representation of the face of Jesus Christ).


There. I said it. Whew…that’s a load off. This admission shouldn’t come as a surprise to most that frequent my site. But I thought I might as well spell it out for those of you in doubt. I indiscriminately hate the jewish religion. That makes me an anti-semite. I hate israel. That makes me an anti-semite. I hate television, newspaper chains and Hollywood movies. That makes me an anti-semite. I don’t even care for bagels. That makes me an anti-semite.

Ok. So? Is that supposed to mean something? Or….is it a scare tactic…a “trick” as one zionist jew once put it? Is it used to identify, or silence? Am I supposed to be afraid of such a label being applied to me? I am not. I do not fear this label any more than “opinionated” or “arrogant” or “outspoken”(all of which have been used to describe me…often(grin)). You will never hear me say ” I am of course no anti-semite, but…”. You WILL hear me say…”I am an anti-semite, therefore…”

The term is a worn-out one, that has very little meaning anymore. It’s like saying “toy boat” many times in a row…after a while it’s just a silly sounding utterance with no discernible connotation. Or as Joe Sobran once said: “An anti-semite used to mean anyone that hates jews, now it refers to anyone that jews hate”. Or I would add…anyone that gets in a jew’s way. But I have decided to embrace their label. I think we all should. It takes the evil out of it…toy boat, toy boat, toy boat…like terrorist, terrorist, terrorist….well, you get the point.

So I don’t fear the label. Even though, as I am sure you are aware, the word is even a nom de course for what it is supposed to condemn…that is to say, that a Semite is not necessarily what we think of today as a jew. A more correct epithet would be anti-jewish, or anti-judaic. Also guilty as charged, on both counts.
Any zionist that engages me in a debate can rest assured that we will get that out of the way right off the bat.

Of course the real reason for the word is to STOP debate. It is a name-calling maneuver of those that wish to end discussion on the subject of judaism or zionism. Why would they want to do that? Perhaps they realize that neither is rationally defensible?
And the “trick” is, that the sensible man-on-the-street will hear you called an anti-semite and immediately equate you with a nazi, or a KKK member. What they try to do is equate it with “racism”(pot? kettle?). But by their own admission, jews are not a race. They are mostly atheists or secular, so what the hell are they that we “anti-semites” are supposed then to be hating. A “CULTURE”. Ah-HA. Then an anti-semite hates the jewISH culture. I can live with that.

Their campaign to demonize we that see their culture for what it is, has worked. Many, many times. It should…G_d knows they have spent enough money and time to make it work. It isn’t as effective as it once was though, because the zionist establishment has taken too many liberties with the word. Now it could mean anything. They haven’t taken care of their purchase very well…it could stand a new coat of paint.

The simple word “jew” is now anti-semitic to use. Really. One says “jew-ish”… not “jew”. In it’s bare form, the word could be misconstrued as a verb. I guess. I never went back for my master’s degree, but doesn’t the suffix “ish” mean “inclined toward” or “tending to”? So now it is only proper to refer to jews as people that are “inclined” toward judaism….or “tend” to be jews. Like, I dunno…Christian-ish, or Muslim-ish. Oh brother. Give me a break.

So I am an anti-semite. Anti-semite, anti-semite, anti-semite…kinda has a lyric, rhythmic quality to it. I like it.
But I digress.
Back to the point.
As the ADL and all their whinging goes nowadays though, there is a NEW anti-semitism. WTF? I was just getting comfortable with the OLD definition. Now you tell me that I might not be kosher in my new-found persona? I have never been a sucker for advertising, but I think I might run out and buy this NEW and IMPROVED version. According to wiki-jew, it now encompasses zionism. Well, duh. I thought I was going to have to alter my thinking yet again. I am up to speed on this one. Have the latest version…anti-semitism 2.o , and I couldn’t be happier with a product…really.

I would guess then that the thrust of this article, besides having a little fun with the jew-ISH crappola that floats around like a…well, you know what….is that name-calling is the last resort of those without anything else to say in their defense. So when they START OUT calling you names…you know that you have already won.

Just sayin…

Sex And the Jews…

“What was forbidden is now permitted.” — Rabbi Samuel Dresner
Sex and the Jews: Letter to a Jewish Correspondent
Dr Lasha Darkmoon
August 29, 2010
A few months ago, I received an angry email from a young woman called Victoria. Having ticked me off severely for various things I’d said in an article —  and after a further exchange of emotional letters — Victoria, who was half Jewish, told me she would no longer be writing to me. So I wrote her a valedictory note in which I took my leave of her with the friendly words, “Farewell, my dear Jewess!”  
Silence ensued for several weeks. And then, to my surprise, I received another confrontational letter from Victoria informing me that she was writing to me again (a) “to correct certain misconceptions you have”, and (b) to tell me that writing to me was “pointless.”
I found this quite amusing. It’s not often I get letters listing all my shortcomings and telling me how pointless it is writing to me. It makes a change. Victoria had taken offense at the term ‘Jewess’Referring to me as a ‘Jewess’ was very offensive and condescending,” she scolded, “because I am only part Jewish.…But I guess in your racist mind,  the fact that I am even part Jewish is enough of a reason for you to deny my humanity completely. Continuing any further correspondence with you is pointless.”
This is the letter I wrote Victoria in response to her final communication. I don’t usually write such long letters to my correspondents, complete with a scholarly apparatus of facts, figures, citations, embedded links and picture illustrations.  On this occasion, I decided to make an exception.   
*          *          * 
Dear Victoria, 
Your condemnation of the word “Jewess” as anti-Semitic would be accepted, I think, as fair comment nowadays. I meant no offense, but in any case please accept my apologies.  
You may not be aware of this, Victoria, but it’s a sad fact that because of severe economic hardships endured by Jews in past centuries, many Jewish girls were forced into a life of prostitution. In all the great European cities, a certain type of prostitute was always to be found: exotic and semi-Asiatic in appearance. She was Jewish, and she was very much in demand. The word “Jewess” therefore entered the language as a loose synonym for “Jewish prostitute”.   
When Baudelaire writes a poem about a Parisian prostitute with whom he had just spent the night, he refers to her simply as a “Jewess”. That was enough to identify her as a prostitute. “Une nuit que j’étais près d’une affreuse Juive…” (“One night as I lay next to a frightful Jewess…”).
When Keats refers to Jewish prostitutes in an unpublished poetic fragment quoted in a private letter (1819), he doesn’t call them “prostitutes”. He just calls them “Jewesses”. Why? Because so many Jewesses were prostitutes that the two terms had virtually become interchangeable. “Nor in obscurèd purlieus would he seek / For curlèd Jewesses, with ankles neat, / Who, as they walk abroad, make tinkling with their feet.”  (See here.)  
Keats is here referring to the typical Jewess with her “curly” ringlets. The tinkling ankle bells he mentions were often worn in past eras by prostitutes to signal their approach. Ever since Ancient India, such bells have been prostitute accessories.
*          *          * 
You say you are “half Jewish”, Victoria, and that your family originally came from the Ukraine. Did you know that Odessa, the capital of Ukraine, was once a magnet for prostitute lovers from all over Europe? The city was famous for its sumptuous brothels, all supervised by Jewish madams who had formerly been prostitutes themselves. As for the girls working in those brothels, they were predominantly Jewish. Valued for their seductive charms, these joygirls were referred to simply as “Jewesses.” 
Here is a pertinent  quote:  
By the 1860s a French visitor to Odessa wrote that Jews there were responsible for a white slavery market in Russian women to Turkey. This is feasible, especially since we know that Jewish brothel-keepers were already in place at the other end in Constantinople. The 1889 census shows that Jewish women ran 30 of 36 licensed brothels in Kherson province, where Odessa was located. In 1908 the American consul there claimed that the whole business of prostitution is almost exclusively in the hands of Jews. Jewesses were prominent in the practice of prostitution. Thus, of 5127 licensed prostitutes in 1889, 1122 or 22 per cent were Jewish.  (See here; Note: 22% is significantly high, given that Jews constituted only 4% of the Ukrainian population..   
A Rabbi Rosenak of the German Union of Rabbis writes in 1902 that up to 50% of the prostitutes in his area were Jewish. He deplores the fact and considers it “inconceivable” that so many Jewish women should go astray.    
Jewish prostitution flourished throughout the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Jewish procuresses ran the brothels, luring both Christian and Jewish girls into a life of prostitution. One Jewish madam was known as “Lucky Sarah”, so named because she was lucky enough to have founded the lucrative Hungarian export trade in girls. Hungarian girls were considered sexy. They had those dark, long-lashed eyes and exotic high cheek bones that so many men find attractive. In short, the Jewish look one finds enshrined in Hollywood’s first femme fatale, also known as “the Vamp”:  

Theda Bara (born  Theodosia Goodman, 1885–1955), Jewish silent screen actress famous for her femme fatale roles. Note the corkscrew curls mentioned earlier by Keats (“curled Jewesses”). The  classic Hollywood femme fatale, Wikipedia tells us, was “often foreign … of an indeterminate Eastern European or Asian ancestry.”
Equally well-known to the Jewish Underworld of the time was Sarah Grossman, another Jewish procuress nicknamed “The Turk” because of the number of girls she had tricked into a life of prostitution in Constantinople. Two major sex emporiums were the industrial towns of Czernowitz and Lemberg. Here countless girls were enticed into a life of sex slavery. In 1892 a famous mass trial of twenty-seven procurers was held in Lemberg.  All the defendants were Jewish. The trial received so much attention, we are told, that it marked “a high water point for the anti-Semites.”  
A major device of the procurers was a Jewish ceremony referred to as the stillah chuppah. This included a religious wedding ceremony which had no civil validity. The soon-to-be abducted female would be misled into believing that she was married with the rights of a wife, only to discover later that her legal rights were nil. Innumerable Jewesses found themselves tossed into brothels by this device.  (See here).
You see what is happening here, Victoria?  Vast numbers of innocent Jewish girls were tricked into a life of prostitution by their fellow Jews. It was their own race who tricked them and sold them down the river. It reminds me of the Jewish rabbis who tricked Norman Finkelstein’s mother out of her fair share of Holocaust reparations.
These are the facts, Victoria. They are the truth. Resist the truth if you want, but truth will prevail in the end. Rather than dismiss me as an “anti-Semite” for drawing the obvious conclusions from these well-known historical data, you should come to terms with the fact that most ordinary Jews are the dupes and victims of organized Jewry. It’s not these ordinary Jews I criticize or condemn, it’s their rabbinical and ideological controllers: the Puppet Masters, or the Masters of Discourse,” to use Israel Shamir’s apt phrase.    
It’s not the sheep, it’s the Bad Shepherds, who are the problem.  
*          *          * 
No class of men appears to be quite as sex-obsessed as the Orthodox Jews and the rabbinate. If you compare the religious texts of the various world religions, you will find that all of them — with the single exception of Judaism — maintain a high moral tone throughout. They don’t keep harping on about breasts and penises, prostitutes and semen. Judaism does.  
Consider this inflammatory passage from the Hebrew English Bible, enough to bring a blush to any maidenly cheek: 
There she lusted after her lovers whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses. So you longed for the lewdness of your youth when in Egypt your bosom was caressed and your young breasts fondled. (Ezekiel 23: 20-21). 
The number of Victorian damsels who must have swooned away over that passage is probably beyond computation.  
Turn to the Babylonian Talmud and you will find yourself suddenly transported into a hothouse world of indelicate anecdotes dealing specifically with prostitutes and their rabbinical (or yeshiva student) clients. There are so many of these stories in the Talmud that a special name had to be invented for them: aggadah. Though these instructive anecdotes touch on all conceivable topics, usually with a rabbi as the central figure, sex often looms large. It can certainly be argued that Judaism is more obsessed with sex than any other world religion. (Scroll down to “Contents”, here.) 
One such story starts like this: “They said of Rabbi Elazar ben Dordia that he did not leave one prostitute in the world that he did not come to. One time he heard that there was a certain prostitute in a town by the sea who took a purse of dinars for her price.  He took a purse of dinars and went and crossed seven rivers to reach her…” (Tractate Avodah Zara 17a). Another story begins: “There was once a man who heard that there was a prostitute in a town by the sea who took four hundred gold coins as her price.  He sent to her four hundred gold coins and set a time to come to her.  When his time came, he went. She said ‘Let him come in’.  When he entered, she sat naked on the top bed…etc. etc. ”  (Tractate Menachot, 44a)
The Talmud is full of such stories about rabbis and their students paying visits to prostitutes. Since the word “pornography” literally means “writing about prostitutes,” the Talmud is perhaps the only religious classic that could be described — in a literal sense — as pornographic.  
We read in the Talmud of Rahab the harlot, for example, first mentioned in the book of Joshua. One of the most bewitching  femmes  fatales of antiquity, on a par with Helen of Troy and the fabulous Corinthian courtesan Lais mentioned by Demosthenes, the beautiful Rahab first began to sell her body at the age of ten. “There was no prince or ruler who had not slept with Rahab the prostitute,” the Talmud informs us breathlessly. (Tractate Zavachim  116b).
The rabbis, being the religious rulers of the day, were among the first to enjoy this nubile nymphette’s favors. Pedophilia? Yes, the Talmud is full of it. We are told of this Jewish Lolita: “They [the rabbis] allow her an honored place in Jewish tradition….Her past as a harlot is not held against her, and is almost entirely forgotten once she converts to Judaism.” (See here). 
Nothing changes. Plus ça change. Pedophilia is okay, it seems, if you happen to be a Jewish rabbi or Roman Polanski — but not if you’re a Catholic priest. 
Pedophilia is not the only sexual perversion to which the Talmud appears to be tolerant. There is also voyeurism. An interesting anecdote relates how Kahane, a yeshiva student, hides under his rabbi’s bed and eavesdrops on him making love to his wife. He is discovered there and severely reprimanded by his teacher who orders him to leave the room at once. The student refuses. “No, I won’t!” he says. “For this is Torah, and I must learn!”
The rabbi is forced to take this into consideration. Spying on people having sex is arguably okay if your motive for doing so is a passion for the Higher Knowledge. (See  The Passionate Talmud, Introduction, p. 1). 
Another section of the Talmud deals with bestiality. Widows are advised not to keep dogs. Why?  “Because”, one is told, “there’s some suspicion about what a woman who’s already tasted the pleasures of the flesh might do with her pet.”
I am not exaggerating when I say that the Talmud’s obsession with sex is unique among world religions. Amazingly, it has to be the only religious text in the world to discuss and compare the penis size of its most venerated sages.  (See  The Passionate Talmud, Introduction, p. 1).  
Ex-President George W Bush on his way to Talmud class              
*          *          *  
Fast forward to the 21st century and we find that the contemporary rabbinate can hardly be cited as models of sexual restraint.  
Turn from the Talmud to Ilana Hammerman’s  In Foreign Parts: Trafficking in Women in Israel and you will read harrowing accounts of Israel’s contemporary sex-service industry. Innocent young girls, many of them underage, are kidnapped in Russia and Eastern Europe and forced into a life of prostitution in Tel Aviv. Locked up without food, subject to threats and violence by their Jewish pimps, these wretched girls are sometimes expected to sleep with up to sixty customers a day. Their most assiduous clients, sporting black hats and bushy beards, are “religious” Orthodox Jews taking a sabbatical from their wives.  
Here is the kind of eye-popping revelation we come across in Hammerman’s shocking book:   
I had a very famous rabbi who would come and order a girl to have sex with him in the doggie position, and would ask her to bark,” a former brothel owner testified at a [Knesset] parliamentary committee. One of the working women, presented as a devout Christian, expresses an aversion to her religious clients: “They had a big black hat and under it [another] little black hat and they were real perverts. (See here).  
According to a CNN report in 1998, Israel now has the highest per capita consumption of prostitute services in the world. One million visits are paid to prostitutes each month, making brothel hopping one of the nation’s most popular pastimes. Thousands of women are  abducted annually — mostly from Russia, Ukraine, Moldavia, Uzbekistan and China  —  and sold into sex slavery in Israel. “The situation,” Jewish author David Weinberg wrote in a 1998 article about prostitution in Israel, entitled Not So Holy Land, “is enough to make you cry in despair — or vomit from shame.”  
*          *          *
Jews certainly have sex on the brain.  
“I’m such a sex machine,” Radio talk show host Howard Stern boasts. “I could take a piece of wood and turn it into something erotic.”   
Woody Allen, loyal supporter of pedophile Roman Polanski, was accused by his estranged wife Mia Farrow of sexually abusing their 7-year-old daughter Dylan. Woody is best known today for his brilliant witticism: “Don’t knock masturbation. It’s sex with someone I love.”    
Hope Weissman, a Jewish professor at Wesleyan university in Connecticut, was the first to give a course on pornography in which her students were expected to “study” the most obscene pornographic magazines and witness a striptease performance by (Jewish) porn star Annie Sprinkle which may have included her famous routine of letting people peer up her vagina with a flashlight.
In  2001, Jewish professor Peter Singer put in a good word for bestiality at Princeton university, suggesting in an essay called Heavy Petting that one might like to get it on with a dog. Again in 2001, a Jewish community in England made big news when three strippers were invited to perform sexually explicit acts in a synagogue, possibly with the resident rabbi in full attendance.
In 1998, Israeli commentator Jonathan Rosenblum, noting that a CNN documentary had revealed that Israel now had the highest rate of prostitution in the world, had this to say: “Once again anti-Semites portray us as sexual libertines and perverts to undermine our moral authority. Today we cheerfully admit the charges.” (See here). 
Of one thing we can be reasonably certain: any society that attracts large numbers of Jews can expect within a few years to enter a spiral of decadence. Moral anarchy sets in. Sexual promiscuity throws open its Pandora’s box of evils. We saw it in Weimar Germany. We see it gathering pace in America today. We see it above all in Israel, a society of fanatical settlers and rabid right-wing rabbis: a country surely doomed to implode from within, sooner or later, under the pressure of its own moral and military excesses.
I cannot help feeling that a great storm is brewing and that only a military coup or revolution can now save America. Save it from what?  From the spiritual cancer that is consuming it from within, and from the foreign wars into which it is being lured — Afghanistan, Iraq, and soon perhaps Iran — on behalf of another nation and its indefatigable agents in America.  
Unless a miracle soon occurs and some charismatic leader comes to our rescue, an unimaginably bleak future surely awaits us: a future in which the only consolations left to us will be mindless entertainment, drugs, alcohol, sexual intoxication — and suicide. 
Sincere best wishes, Victoria, and good luck to you in the days of terror and tribulation that lie ahead.
Lasha Darkmoon
Armageddon (see here and here) 
Dr Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic, age 32, with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a published poet and translator whose verse can be sampled here. “Lasha Darkmoon” is a pen name.

Outside The Temple…

Damn. I did it again. I seem to have strayed outside the temple one more time.
I clearly do NOT know how to stay in line…never have. And I rarely keep my hands to myself either.

I just wrote an article that touched on the “truther” movement (and apparently stepped on some wee-wees)that people didn’t care for. I take that as a personal affront. I like it. They don’t try to tackle the guy that isn’t carrying the ball…as they say.

What they didn’t like about it, generally speaking…I agree with. It is a shame that their efforts are essentially wasted at this point. I am not trying to be facetious here. I mean that sincerely. So many people are on board with this “truth” thing that it is heartening, and in no way do I mean to belittle their “intentions”. Well…most of them anyway. Because it is evident to anyone with a brain, that this faction of truthers is being led by those with…well, another agenda. Much like the tea-party people.
The people that join these “revolutionary” efforts are so open and trusting and honest and well-meaning, that is almost defies logic. And sooooo ripe for the kill.

It’s like the “commercial” spot that the 9/11 truthers have made, hoping to air in the Jew York market. They really don’t get it. They aren’t seeing the perpetrators for whom they really are. If for one moment they believe that they are going to televise something like that…then I pity them their ignorance.

Here is a partial list of what they are going to hear from any tv network about why it won’t happen:
1. You cannot defame the relatives of those lost, that do not agree with your “conspiracy theories”. It wouldn’t be fair to them.
2. The issue of who committed the 9/11 attacks has been officially settled by our government. There is no need to re-open that wound.
3. If you don’t agree with such government findings about these events, then you should contact your representatives in Washington…not try to air your concerns in public.
4. I am sorry, but we cannot jeopardize the relationship that this network has with it’s sponsors by airing a few individual’s controversial take on this subject.

Hello? Does anyone wonder why nothing like this has ever been (or is ever going to be) aired on “their” media? It is “their” media, folks. They aren’t going to shoot themselves in the foot by letting you pull the trigger. Sheesh…it’s so simple.

Anyway it all boils(as in frogs) down to the point that truthers feel uneasy about. And that is following the money trail, and naming the true culprits. Of course it doesn’t help that they are being ham-strung by their own leaders…like Alex Jones et al. They are being steered away from the only logical conclusion, to wild theories about mini-nukes, death rays from outer space and heaven forbid, the evil planning of George Bush?

If this is the “temple” from which I wandered…I don’t think I will be back soon. Go ahead without me…K?

I do this to myself. I know…I know. I can’t keep my big mouth shut. If something looks and smells like bullshit…I gotta shout about it from the rooftops. Not caring for one moment who I am alienating.
I scream about this and that…laugh at what I consider to be ridiculous explanations of why we are where we are. I should shut up more. I guess.
But that’s not why I started this whole thing. I don’t want to be included in a group of “Illuminati” or “Freemason” or “Holy Scripture” screamer clubs, any more than I want to don a yarmulke and strap a silly-looking little box to my head. One group is the core of evil in this world…and the others enable them. IMHO.

I guess, unless I knuckle under to the “revolutionary” party line and search images till my eyes bleed looking for Lady Gaga flashing the devil gesture to print on my blog…I am doomed to not being linked by the more popular sites. Bummer.

Oh well. It comes with the territory, I think. ‘Nuf said…


I don’t want to undermine any efforts to fight for truth. No, really…I don’t.

I understand that the events of September 11th, 2001 led to a lot of people getting on-board the truth movement. And that’s a good thing…for the most part. But this cause…the cause to ferret out the truth of what happened that day is never going to produce the kind of results that I hope to see. Number one…like the Kennedy assassination, it is going to be lost in folklore. The facts of the incident will be clouded and debated for untold years. That is what they want. There will be no final factual conclusion brought about by the efforts of “truthers”. There will be no independent investigation that roots out the perpetrators. No punishment to those that were guilty of this false flag. Anyone that believes that this will happen is living in a fantasy. As the late George Carlin said when asked if he supported the call for another investigation…”the government investigating themselves?…ain’t gonna happen”.

Of course you are thinking…”Well we are certainly not going to expose the truth with THAT kind of attitude!”. And I would answer…”you aren’t fighting the right battle”.

Every time that this infamous date rolls around, we see the same debate smolder in the embers of a dying cause then go dark again.
This attitude of mine is not going to win me friends or influence people out here…I know. It is a betrayal to many. But there it is. It is not that I do not understand the magnitude of the event…the actual stateside attack by israhell. I do. But if any think that they are going to grab the hand that stole the cookie out of the jar and yell AH-HA! and PROVE that it was all a lie…I’m sorry to tell you, it is not going to happen that way.
That is not to say, that those who did 9/11 will not be exposed at some point in the future…but it will be a matter of where the chips happen to fall when JEWISH interests are unveiled for even the most clueless to see. It will be one of those…”Oh, they did THAT too?” type of things.

I guess…in a nutshell…I am saying that we have bigger fish to fry.

We are in a battle against a clever and devious foe. It began long ago, and the world has landed a few punches(expelling jews from most every civilized nation, at one point or other) in the fight, but they are winning right now on points. 9/11 was a hell of a round-house to the jaw. But we don’t start crying to our Mothers about it…we get back in the fight and take it TO him that threw that blow. It should get our fighting anger pumping toward evening the score…not whining about it’s not being fair because we were lied to about who threw it.

So yes, I have avoided writing about the events of that day and the theories surrounding it…the “hole-no hole”, plane-no plane” “building 7-no plane” proposals.
I spent many years at a job in which I was in the cockpit of a 767 on a daily basis. I KNOW that no untrained person could have flown one of these aircraft into any buildings with the pin-point accuracy that it would require.
That’s it. This commercial aircraft is simply too complicated to fly. Didn’t happen. End of story….move on.

I have. Many out here haven’t. And you are playing into their hand.

Those truthers out there are being played for the innocents that they are. They are being made to look ridiculous by those to whom they are begging for vindication. They have become “tin-foil hatters” and “conspiracy wing-nuts” in the jew’s media. Those with all the right intentions have been silenced…so let’s move on to the meat of the matter. 9/11 truth is viewed, by those that actually pulled off the tragedy, as harmless. They don’t put truthers in prison…ever wonder why? They put “holocaust deniers” there. They are MUCH more dangerous to the tribe. Think about that for a moment.

I know I sound preachy here again…but I just can’t help seeing that no one is attacking this mad dog where he lives. No one out here is hacking into their media or attacking the recent progeny of the Rothschild clan. No one is peaceably tearing down their symbols of power and wealth. No one is exposing jews for what they are. Your money and time can be spent much more wisely. These are the things that rebels do. These are the things that get results. “They” took off the gloves a long time ago. Truthers are battling this opponent with pillows.

I am reminded of an incident that happened in early 1941. After having filmed “Citizen Kane” on an entirely closed set, Orson Welles surprised critics at a closed premier of his film with it’s contents. Although Welles later said that he really didn’t intend for his story to be and expose’ on William Randolph Hurst, the publishing king at the time,that is how it was taken. Hurst, his mistress and all that worked for him were furious.
Hurst got the film shelved(for a time) by calling Hollyweird bosses and threatening to print on the front page of the LA times (which he owned), a list of all the jews that ran tinsel-town. He threatened to expose them for the nest of communist vipers that they were. That produced results. And that’s what I am talking about. You might say that the common man doesn’t have those kind of financial resources(although people like Oliver Stone do and he is using it…are “we” supporting him?), and I would agree, if you are talking about “one” common man. However, in concert…our power is unstoppable. We have the intelligence. We do the work. We possess the resources to bring this demon to it’s knees and yet we are seen to be…whimpering in the very face of evil.

So, no…I won’t rehash the events of 9/11 here. It is not the battle that I choose to fight. I won’t be made to look clownish in their media. I would rather be thrown in one of their prisons for calling a jew a jew, than to put on one of their tin-foil hats.

But that’s just me. Take it or leave it.

Stay tuned for Part II: I AM AN ANTI-SEMITE!


This is going to be another one of those rambling things. Just some observations that have been collecting like leaves in those little corners where the wind always whips them around. Every once in a while you have to rake them out or they pile up. Entropy…or something like that. With a couple punches to the groin, thrown in.

I don’t normally take lyrics home with me. That is to say, outside of Lennon, lyrics to songs are just rhyming sounds to my ears. But a few times I have caught myself identifying with a phrase or couplet from a popular song and can’t get it out of my head.

An old “Animals” song was one of these. “I’m just a soul whose intentions are good, Oh Lord, please don’t let me be misunderstood”. I like that.

Someone once said that graveyards are filled with good intentions. I like that too. If these supine ex-people could speak would they tell tales of the Edgar Lee Masters variety? I think most would reproach themselves for what they didn’t do in their few moments in this reality. I know I would, even though I am not in the marble orchard yet.
As I have stated here before, I am an embarrassment to my family because of this site. Ok. I don’t mind. At some point after I am permanently planted, perhaps my views here will be vindicated. Or maybe they will come out with a new FDA approved wonder-drug that will alleviate the symptoms of my affliction, and my descendants will just tsk…tsk in their pity for the small notoriety that great-great-great grandfather achieved by way of his mental disease. Who knows.

All I know is that I can’t feed that animal that is my base instincts…and retain any kind of self-respect. Popular culture pulls us to do just that. I happen to look beyond that culture for the perpetrators of such advertisement. And more often than not…well, you know who it is.

A lot of ink has been spilled recently about a pornographic video called “2 girls, 1 cup”. Many are heralding it as the proverbial last straw in the moral decay of the West. I disagree.
I refuse to link this video(perhaps a little rebellion on my part), unlike so many other sites. I refuse to be part of the refuse that furthers it’s message. Although apparently it is OK to do so. I don’t understand that. But I don’t understand a lot of things about the judaic “popular” culture.
Anyway, like I was saying…this video to me is not the last straw. Not by a long shot. Firstly, this cinemagraphic masterpiece has been around a long time. It is not the worst of it’s phylum. It is merely typical of the jewish mentality that insists on publishing such anti-human garbage. Do you want to see what raising a child to hold nothing sacred, with no moral compass or regard for human dignity produces? Do you want to see what the outcome is of raising a child to believe that other human beings are it’s purchased playthings? Do you want to see the inner jew?

No…you don’t.

There are many videos on jewtube of people watching this film. Their reactions to it, somehow have become a subject of interest. Maybe that’s a good thing. Watch a couple. Look into the clash. Look into the eyes of decent people as they witness all that is brought to our species by a “chosen” few…in the span of a few minutes. There is usually only a flash of horror(and a struggle to keep their lunch down) on their collective countenance, replaced immediately with the laughter of embarrassment, which I have discussed earlier here, though few took note, I think.

This is what you bought. And this is only an up-tick on the graph depicting our decline. It will get much worse. For us…not them.

This film depicts the sordid details of the filth that is jewish. The clip was produced, directed and distributed by jews, as are most all of them in the pornographic/sick genre. There is no denying it, or need to in the eyes of those that understand the big picture. And yet, as absolutely sub-human as this display is, it cannot hope to compete with the same disregard with which the jewish war-machine slaughters millions of innocent humans …but there are no jewtube “reaction” clips posted about that. Perhaps because there would be no laughter…and we all know what is on the screen.

If you care to live in this world that “they” have designed. If you care to participate like good little animals being kept for their pleasure, then you better get to like this sort of thing and get in touch with that “animal” in you…or you won’t fair well in their world.

Don’t let me be misunderstood.